Skip to main content

The curriculum committee should facilitate the development of the curriculum by interacting as much as possible with faculty members while developing curriculum proposals. In its review of proposals, the CC should seek to carefully evaluate the rationale and impact of proposals from an institutional perspective. The Curriculum Committee's principal objective is to review and evaluate the general education curriculum and the curricula of majors, minors, and other academic programs to ensure that they carry out the college's stated mission.

2026–27 Curriculum Committee Members


Curriculum Committee Members 2026-2027
CHAIRFACULTYEX-OFFICIO (non-voting)RECORDER
Debbie EgolfDoug AnkromJoseph Straw, LibrarianTisha Smith
 Stephanie CraigTina Hickman, Registrar 
 Rakib SarkerSuzanne Walker, Provos 
 Mark Schaefer  
 Merewyn Weinkauf  

The Curriculum Committee meets from 2:00–3:00 p.m. on Wednesdays in Brown 210 throughout the fall and spring semesters.

 

Curriculum Committee Submission Deadlines


Proposals are to be submitted through the College’s course management software. 

Links may be found below in the Curriculum Committee Forms & Proposal Processes section of this page.

Complex proposals or proposals that may require revision should be submitted as early as possible.

To accommodate the timely production of course schedules and the next catalog, as well as external approval and recruiting for new programs, the following are deadlines for submissions to the Curriculum Committee for this academic year:
 

September 28, 2026

  • New courses for Spring 2027
  • Courses seeking exemption from/addition to a general education designation for Spring 2027

 

October 19, 2026

  • New major, minor, or specialization programs
  • Significant changes to existing major, minor, or specialization programs

 

February 8, 2027

  • New courses for the 2027-2028 academic year
  • Summer 2027 courses seeking approval for online delivery

Curriculum Committee Forms & Proposal Processes


Proposals for curriculum committee processes should be submitted using the forms below. Completed forms are to be emailed to records@marietta.edu. 

Smart Catalog Curriculum Management has been discontinued.

Available forms:

When developing new courses or revising existing course, faculty are encouraged to refer to the MC ISLO definitions available on the CC SharePoint site.


Proposals for New or Substantially Revised Majors, Minors, & Other Academic Programs

Faculty members should consider the following questions when proposing new programs or substantial changes to existing programs, as these important issues will be considered by the CC when reviewing the proposal.

  1. Rationale for the new program
  2. Expected enrollments
  3. Anticipated impacts on other programs at the college
  4. Impact of staffing of courses (including general education requirements)
  5. Adequacy of library holdings and other campus resources (e.g. labs, information technology)
  6. How the new program fits with the mission of the department and with the mission and strategic plan of the College
  7. The order in which a student would take courses and progress toward completing the program

Proposals for Eliminating Majors, Minors, and Other Academic Programs

Proposers should consider the following questions when proposing the elimination of an academic program, as these important issues will be considered by the CC when reviewing the proposal.

  1. Rationale for elimination of the program
  2. The number of students currently enrolled in the program
  3. Anticipated impact on other programs, general education curriculum and the mission of the College
  4. Anticipated impact on current staff of the program
  5. A teach-out plan for students currently enrolled in the program

 

Curriculum Policies, Practices, and Procedures


I. Proposal Review Process

A proposal may be a request for approval of a new course, a significant change in a course, new requirements for a major/minor, a request for a new academic major, minor or academic program, or the elimination of major, minor or academic program. Further details and requirements in regards to different types of proposals are described in the following sections.

  1. When the Curriculum Committee receives a proposal, the chair:
    • Assigns a reference number based upon the date of receipt
    • Places the proposal on the agenda for a future CC meeting
    • Assigns the proposal to a member(s) of the committee to be the reviewer
    • Establishes a tentative date for the CC reviewer to report on the proposal to the full CC
    • Reminds all members to review the proposal ASAP and forward any questions or comments to the CC reviewer
  2. The Curriculum Committee members:
    • Examine the impact of the proposal on the curriculum of the proposing department, other departments and programs, the general education curriculum and mission of the college as a whole
    • All CC members are responsible for investigating the merits of the proposal; however, the CC member assigned as a reviewer should discuss any questions or concerns the CC has with the faculty member or department members submitting the proposal. The CC reviewer will report back to the Curriculum Committee, and the CC will discuss the proposal and vote.

 


 

II. Course Proposals

  1. New courses proposed for college catalog. (see online information)
  2. Experimental courses. (allowing rapid deployment of new, innovative courses). (see online information)
  3. Special Topics courses. Special Topics courses are those for which the specific subject and title in the semester course listing may change between offerings. For example, the hypothetical course SOCI 345 “Current Topics in Sociology” may be listed one semester as SOCI 345 “Social Dynamics of Middle Eastern Nations”, SOCI 345 “Changing Social Structure of Cuba” the next time it is offered, etc. The description of these courses in the college catalog should include the phrase “…Topics in…” in the title and the sentence “Topics may vary with each offering.” in the course description. Only if the current offering of the course would count toward General Education requirements does it require Curriculum Committee approval; otherwise the current name and description can be sent directly to the Registrar for inclusion in the course listing.
  4. Leadership Courses. Proposals for new or substantial changes to leadership courses (LEAD or D-designated) must first be approved by the McDonough Faculty Advisory Committee before the proposals are sent to the Curriculum Committee.
  5. Graduate Courses. (see online information)
  6. Honors Program Courses. Proposals for new or substantial changes to honors courses must first be approved by the director of the college honors program before being submitted to the Curriculum Committee.
  7. First-Year Seminar Courses. Unless there is a substantial change to the overall structure or format of first-year seminar courses, all FYSE 101 and FYSE 102 lab courses are approved by the director of the first year program.
  8. Cross-Listing of Courses. It is the policy of the CC to approve appropriate courses for cross-listing as a means of encouraging interdisciplinary activity and thereby enriching the curriculum. The content of a cross-listed course should represent the scholarship of both disciplines and may be taught by faculty from either department. Approval by the departments involved is necessary for cross-listing of a course.
     

 

III. Proposals for majors, minors, and other academic programs

Where there is no specific form for eliminating or adding majors, minors and other programs, the proposals should include:

  1. An overview and explanation of the proposal
  2. Course proposal forms, as required
  3. New or modified degree audit sheets. Note: Any pre- or co-requisites for courses required in the program must also be included in the major/minor/certificate program requirements.
  4. Suggested outline or timetable of how students would complete the requirements
  5. A brief assessment plan for new majors and new minors, if the minor is not a subset of a major. This plan may include items such as vision, mission, learning outcomes, and assessment methods.
  6. If the proposal is to eliminate a major, minor, or program, include a plan for allowing students currently enrolled in the program to finish.
  7. Signatures of the Chairs of all pertinent departments or programs
  8. Send 1 paper copy and 1 electronic copy of the proposal to the Records Office.

When preparing the explanation for the proposal, address the following issues:

  1. Expected enrollments
  2. Anticipated impacts on other programs at the college
  3. Impact of staffing of course (including general education courses)
  4. Adequacy of library holdings and other campus resources (e.g., labs, information technology)
  5. How the major, minor or program fits with the mission of the department and with the mission of the college
  6. Limitations on hours in the program:
    • Majors: 35-60 credit hours
    • Minors: 18-24 credit hours
    • Certificates: a minimum of 13 credit hours
    • Exceptions may be considered upon submission of supporting rationale.
       

 

IV. Miscellaneous

Typically the first deadline is about four weeks prior to the registrar’s deadline for inclusion in the course listing and the second deadline is about four weeks before the registrar’s deadline for inclusion in the course catalog. Particularly extensive or potentially ‘controversial’ proposals should be submitted before these deadlines to ensure timely action. The chair of CC should circulate the due dates to all department chairs at the beginning of each semester.

  1. Minutes
    Minutes of each preceding meeting should be circulated by the recorder to all committee members before the next meeting at which time the committee votes on approval. The approved minutes are circulated by the chair to:
    • The academic dean
    • The Director of the Library for inclusion in the library reference file
    • The college community via posting to the curriculum committee web page
  2. Changes to Catalog Course Descriptions
    The chair of the CC can approve all changes to course descriptions. However, if the chair of CC believes the proposed wording alters or impacts the goals or objectives of the course, then the proposed wording changes should come to the full CC for review. These changes will be reported to the committee and recorded in the minutes. Descriptions of courses should be accurate, brief, and clear. In general, descriptions should be limited to 60 words that describe the primary theme(s) of the course and any extraordinary requirements. The faculty member is responsible for contacting the records office staff to ensure that approved wording makes its way into all college documents.
  3. Course Numbering (100, 200, 300, and 400 levels)
    Departments should give careful consideration to the numerical listing of courses. Course numbering is an important consideration that communicates much about the course, both on and off the Marietta College campus. While some connotations of course numbering map apply to certain disciplines, in general, the CC encourages departments to apply the following criteria:
    • 100 Level Courses-should be taught at a level appropriate for first and second year students with little background in the discipline. Courses at the 100 level typically represent broad surveys of a topic or a discipline, are general service courses for the general education curriculum or other majors, and serve as introductory requirements for specific majors.
    • 200 Level Courses-represent more focused analysis of a topic within a discipline. These courses may represent general service courses for the general education curriculum and may be core courses for a program of study. Courses at the 200 level should hold students to an academic standard greater than the 100 level courses.
    • 300 and 400 Level Courses-should be taught at a level appropriate for third and fourth year students. The content of these courses is typically advanced and specialized and require academic skills developed in lower level courses. These courses should present greater challenges to students and require a higher level of independent scholarship than lower level courses.
  4. Due Dates for Proposals needing CC Approval
    There are generally two important deadlines:
    • Last date for which proposals will be accepted for inclusion in the spring semester course listing.
    • Last date for which proposals will be accepted for inclusion in the next college catalog.

 

Guidelines for Student-Designed Majors


The Curriculum Committee offers these informal guidelines to assist anyone developing a student-designed major. The official procedure for submitting a student-designed major is outlined in the college catalog.

The Marietta College Catalog and website state that a student-designed major must

  • draw from curricula of two or more departmental programs
  • differ substantially from existing majors
  • focus on a particular subject area
  • be comparable in rigor to a conventional major
  • include a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 60 credit hours
    • no more than two-thirds of these will be from an existing major
    • no more than two-thirds of these will be completed before the major is approved

The student should work with his or her academic advisor to write a proposal including

  • a rationale for the major demonstrating that it fulfills the criteria above
  • signatures from the chairs of all departments whose courses are included in the major
  • curriculum for the major (list of courses organized as on an audit sheet)
  • a suitable title for the major

The proposal will be submitted to the Records Office for distribution to the Provost and Curriculum Committee. Download a sample proposal (PDF).

The Curriculum Committee will study the proposal and take one of the following steps:

  • approve the proposal as submitted
  • reject the proposal
  • request further information or revision to the proposal

What will help a proposal receive approval?
The Curriculum Committee offers the following suggestions for students and faculty members developing student-designed major proposals:

Remember that after the proposal is approved, it is the only document the Records Office can use to verify whether the student has fulfilled the requirements for the major. Therefore, information essential to the major must be included in the written proposal. Some proposals are rejected because essential information which may have been agreed upon orally is not included in the written proposal.

Be sure the proposal includes a suitable title for the major. The title of the major will appear on student records and transcripts, so it should accurately express the focus of the major, and it should sound like one focused course of study and not several majors randomly stuck together. "Student-Designed Major" is not an adequate title. "Basket-Weaving and Marine Biology" looks like two majors rather than one focused course of study, while "Underwater Basket Weaving" sounds more focused.

"Underwater Basket Weaving" does not, on the other hand, sound comparable in academic rigor to other majors. What makes a major academically rigorous? Look at the requirements for similar majors here or at other colleges; pay attention to the types of courses required and the number of upper-level courses required. Make sure the proposal includes a capstone course.

If independent study courses are included in the proposed major, provide as much detail about these courses as possible.

If courses within the major have prerequisites, make sure the proposal states whether the student has taken required prerequisites and if not, where the prerequisites fit into the program. If prerequisites have been waived, the proposal should say so.

It is helpful for the Curriculum Committee to envision why the proposed major is needed. What makes it different from majors already available? How is it better than a double major or a major and minor? What makes it unique? The rationale should express this clearly.

It is also helpful for the Curriculum Committee to envision what kind of career the major will equip the student to pursue. Consider including data about job availability and demand for graduates in the field. Also, consider asking advice from professionals in the field about what courses would provide the best preparation and what kind of demand there is for graduates in this particular field of study.

It is not unusual for the Curriculum Committee to request further information or suggest revisions to a student-designed major proposal. If this occurs, the committee chair will inform the student and the advisor of specific areas of concern. Proposals may be revised and resubmitted as many times as the student wishes.

Finally, students are urged to start the process early. The major must be approved before the student has completed two-thirds of the required coursework, but proposers should be sure to allow adequate time for revision of proposals.